Sustainability continues to be a driving force in shaping international trade regulations. At the UN Climate Change Conference (COP 30) held in November 2025, foreign countries discussed how trade tools can advance their climate goals such as using trade measures that would encourage deforestation-free supply chains, lower carbon emissions, and eliminating unnecessary packaging waste [1]. Several major trading partners, including the European Union (EU) and Canada, continue to incorporate climate‑related initiatives into their trade regulations. Below are sustainability efforts underway that showcase how climate goals are being accommodated in trade policy and how U.S. exporters should prepare: EU & UK: Traceability and Carbon Adjustment Requirements The EU is leading the way in climate-friendly initiatives, tackling both traceability reporting requirements and efforts to reduce carbon emissions. This year, the EU adopted the European Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) to cut emissions and biodiversity loss by promoting “deforestation‑free” products and reducing its global deforestation footprint. By 2027, any company importing at-risk agricultural products such as cocoa, soy, and palm oil into the EU will need to prove that these exports do not originate from recently deforested land or have contributed to forest degradation [2]. U.S. exporters sourcing these ingredients for products to then be exported to the EU may be asked to disclose information to their importer to ensure compliance. In addition, the EU launched their Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) initiative in January 2026. CBAM implements a carbon levy on certain goods imported into the EU (i.e., fertilizers, steel, aluminum, iron, cement, electricity, and hydrogen) [3]. In addition, EU importers must gather and report information on both the direct emissions produced during the manufacturing of processed goods and the indirect emissions resulting from the electricity used in that process. U.S. exporters of the goods may need to be prepared to track and report on their direct and indirect emissions and disclose this information to their importer. The United Kingdom (UK) is also following suit with similar measures. In 2019, the UK introduced guidance to support businesses in meeting the requirements of its Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting (SECR) framework. Under these rules, any UK company listed on the London Stock Exchange, an EU-regulated market, or trading shares on the New York Stock Exchange or NASDAQ must disclose their scope 1 (direct emissions), scope 2 (indirect emissions from energy), and scope 3 (value chain emissions) emissions, along with the methodologies used to calculate them [4]. These reporting requirements may extend to U.S. exporters working with UK companies. Canada: Reducing plastic pollution and promoting the circular economy Policies encouraging efforts to continually redesign, reduce, reuse, repair, refurbish, remanufacture, repurpose, or recycle products to minimize waste are becoming more common [5]. These policies intend to promote a more circular economy by reducing plastic pollution. For example, Canada started implementing their new plastics policy in 2025, which requires companies to report annually on the quantities and types of plastics they manufacture, import, or place on the Canadian market. Once fully rolled out, Canadian companies will need to disclose the amount of plastic waste generated at their industrial, commercial, and institutional facilities. As a result, U.S. exporters should be prepared to disclose information to importers and manufacturers on the types of plastics that were used when manufacturing goods [6]. China & Brazil: Suggested Corporate Sustainability Standards In 2024, China published its Basic Guidelines for Corporate Sustainability Disclosure Standards (CSDS) with a goal to align Chinese companies with global environmental, social, and governance (ESG) expectations. This guidance marks a major step towards establishing a national sustainability disclosure system by 2030 [7]. China’s CSDS framework is designed to align with the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), strengthening consistency and enhancing cross‑border comparability in sustainability reporting by issuing general standards for sustainability and climate-related disclosures [8]. By taking this step, China is helping their importers meet sustainability standards in export markets. Brazil followed a similar approach to China by adopting ISSB’s inaugural sustainability standards for voluntary reporting for all companies starting in 2026 [9]. With these standards in place, Brazilian companies now have clearer disclosure requirements that help them convey to investors the sustainability‑related risks and opportunities they face. U.S. companies working with Chinese and Brazilian companies may be asked to adhere to ISSB standards. United States: Sustainable Packaging Innovation Lab The United States sustainability initiatives remain fluid, reflecting shifting priorities throughout different Administrations. However, the United States recognizes that certain sustainability measures abroad could impose additional burdens on U.S. exporters and that businesses need assistance in transitioning to more sustainable practices. For example, several countries have adopted packaging and packaging waste regulations which ban the use of certain materials, set reuse and refill targets, and establish extended producer responsibility. Such regulations can increase costs and limit market access for U.S. exporters as they are expected to comply. One initiative designed to help U.S. exporters meet these requirements and better compete in overseas markets is US Department of Agriculture (USDA)’s grant as part of the Assisting Specialty Crop Exports (ASCE) Initiative to support the Sustainable Packaging Innovation Lab [10]. This initiative awarded multiple grants for research projects including innovative packaging solutions and technologies such as compostable plant-based thin film and bags, fully recyclable cellulose-based packaging, edible thin-film coating for cucumbers and bell peppers, and more [11]. The work of the Sustainable Packaging Innovation Lab demonstrates the US government’s awareness of potential sustainability-related barriers that may affect agricultural exports to foreign markets. Future Outlook These are only some of the various ways a handful of countries have pursued integration of climate-related measures into trade and business policies. However, more than 50 export markets have implemented measures designed to promote recyclability, lower carbon emissions, and reduce plastic waste. As more countries introduce climate-focused regulations, exporters must ensure they understand the relevant requirements and how to adapt to a greener, climate-friendly trade environment. [1] COP 30: Key issues on trade and climate agenda, IISD (4 Nov 2025) [2] Regulation on Deforestation-free Products, European Commission [3] Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, European Commission [4] Environmental reporting guidelines: including Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting requirements, UK Government (29 Mar 2019) [5] Circular Economy, Government of Canada (23 Mar 2025) [6] Federal Plastics Registry, Government of Canada (13 Mar 2026) [7] Corporate Sustainability Disclose Standards, China’s Ministry of Finance (17 Dec 2024) [8] China embarks on a journey of ESG disclosure: 2024 progress and focus for 2025, UN Environment Program (7 Jan 2025) [9] Brazil adopts ISSB global baseline, as IFRS Foundation Trustees meet in Latin America, IFRS (20 Oct 2023) [10] Sustainable Packaging Innovation Lab, USDA [11] Research funding awarded for packaging innovations to support American Fresh Produce Exporters, USDA FAS (29 July 2025) In celebration of International Women’s Day month, I wanted to share a few shout-outs to some amazing women working in cross-border trade who have been my mentors, bosses, clients, colleagues, friends and co-workers over the years. These are only some of the many extraordinary women I have crossed paths with who have helped and inspired me, contributing ultimately to TradeMoves’ success over the past twenty years. A big thank you to these incredible women and cheers to all the accomplished women out there helping trade move!
• Lisa Maher, trade guru formerly with Chrysler and its many iterations, was my first boss in DC. As a newbie, I learned a great deal from her about government relations, advocacy and advancing trade priorities. She was tough but fair and always saw a solution amongst the noise. • Marietta Bernot, affectionately known as “The Chocolate Lady”, took me on as her first employee of the-then new US-EU trade advisory joint venture with EPPA, a pan-European public affairs firm. In our office work room, she put up a plaque that said: “You don’t get what you deserve, you get what you negotiate.” Given her role in helping companies negotiate market access before the WTO and USMCA eased trade facilitation, this hit it on the head. I worked for her for nearly ten years and learned not only about trade, but how to run a small business and the importance of high-quality deliverables for your clients. • Mary Latimer, a master negotiator, became a client upon leaving USTR and underscored the importance of persistence, details matter, coordination and collaboration are key to advancing trade priorities, and that people, planet and profit must move in sync for global supply chains to work for all stakeholders. She included me as a thought partner on strategy and I appreciate her pushing me to think outside the box in tackling issues. • Sandra Benson was first a colleague when we both worked for Marietta, and then became a client. She is one of the smartest people in this town on regulatory issues, and lives in the weeds of the many facets of tariffs, TRQs, SPS issues, import requirements, health certificates and the intricacies of moving US dairy products to markets around the world. In addition, she is one of the kindest people in DC and always willing to share her insights and expertise with the younger generation of TradeMoves analysts. • Alison Bodor, Karen Horan and Laura Shumow are three kick-@$$ women who have supported TradeMoves from its first days. Their expertise in food and ag, championing US exports, encouraging import policies that support US domestic manufacturing, and encouraging TradeMoves’ growth is forever appreciated. • Lisa Schroeter, one of the first of my generation of women in trade that I met here in DC, and one of the savviest on trade policy that I know. Cutting our teeth on trade through (the now-defunct) TABD was an amazing master class on US-EU industry cooperation and B2G relations on both sides of the pond. Lisa’s passion to pay it forward through her involvement in WIIT and to support the next-gen of trade gurus is much admired. • Tiffany Smith is a kindred spirit. While our paths initially only crossed a bit on trade, we became fast friends through our love of wine and through a network of friends. Tiffany’s command of trade issues, policy considerations and strategic thinking make her stand out and I appreciate her friendship, knowledge and mentorship as I learned the ropes on being a cleared advisor to the USG in my early days of TradeMoves. • Megan Giblin is synonymous with “customs policy guru”, working at the intersection of trade policy and customs operations to facilitate trade and ensure secure supply chains for her phenomenal rolodex (okay, LinkedIn) of connections in business, government and institutions around the world. She and I were introduced by a long-time friend and colleague, Jeff Bensing, and whenever we are together, laughter fills the time. • Melissa Kessler is a unicorn – trade policy expert, passionate advocate for US ag, AND a strategic and organizational design wizard. I first met Melissa when she was my client contact for a USDA-funded project. I got to work with her on showcasing how USDA cooperators were implementing new and innovative ways to connect with customers and consumers in export markets. In returning to her roots, she is now an advisor to our TradeMoves’ team as we look to build and grow over the next 20 years and her insights and recommendations are invaluable to our transition. • Kim Benson, Candace Chen, Sharon Freeman and Karyn Page are four of the most amazing women in international trade AND small business owners/leaders who work tirelessly to promote opportunities for companies of all sizes to take advantage of growth markets around the world. They have each acted as Chair for the ITAC for Small Business, leading with grace, passion, wisdom and energy that I strive for in my career. • Christina Sevilla is a relentless champion for US small businesses and exporters. As a member of the ITAC for Small Business, I had the pleasure of working with Christina in her role at USTR for over a decade, sharing thoughts and ideas to help advance US trade policy and ensure it works for small businesses; thank you for all you do and have done to ensure SMEs have the resources and support they need to compete in foreign markets. • Jackie Smith knows food policy, regulatory affairs, public affairs and the European Union like no other person I know. I was lucky enough to work with Jackie through many different firms and client relationships and have always found her counsel on technical trade issues and strategy to be no-nonsense, impactful and spot on. Clients adore her! The best part, we always laughed, and it seemed the tougher the issue, the greater our sense of humor ratcheted up to tackle what lay ahead. • Beth Johnson is a nutrition policy wonk and Dulce Zahniser a trade finance wonk. Wonk is simply the word “know” spelled backwards and their knowledge in running their own consulting firms and providing expert advice to U.S. exporters is unmatched in their respective fields of expertise and experience. Our partnership with each of them has allowed us to expand our knowledge in nutrition policy and trade finance, respectively, and better service our clients on their cross-border trade strategies. • Anna Helm is a professor at my MBA alma mater whose passion for international business and education have made her the go-to person for identifying trade analysts to join our firm. As an alum, it was an honor to serve on the Advisory Board to the GW Center for International Business and Education Research (GW CIBER) under her leadership and guidance. I appreciate all she does to pay it forward for the up-and-coming students pursuing careers in international trade, cross-border business and global supply chains. Feting these incredible women (and more!) who have shaped my career, our team and our firm is one of the best ways to celebrate our anniversary. In coming months, I look forward to celebrating TradeMoves’ alumni who have launched their careers from TradeMoves and are continuing to work in various aspects of cross-border trade. Shawn Marie Jarosz Chief Trade Strategist Global supply chains are dynamic and complex. 2024 highlighted the persistence and evolution of challenges that tested global supply chain resilience. From escalating geopolitical tensions to labor disputes and climate-induced disruptions, these events continue to shape the global trade landscape. Below is an overview of key drivers behind disruptions and ongoing implications for industries, businesses, and consumers worldwide.
Geopolitical Tensions: Ongoing geopolitical strain between major economies such as the U.S., China, and Russia has resulted in increased trade barriers and sanctions.
Labor Strikes and Workforce Challenges:
Natural Disasters and Climate Change: Increased natural disasters—hurricanes, floods, and wildfires—have directly impacted supply chains.
Various players throughout supply chains will be in both reactive and proactive mode to address and mitigate these challenges.
As these issues persist, the need for proactive measures such as diversifying trade networks and fostering resilience has become more critical than ever, particularly for U.S. businesses and SMEs. The Department of Commerce’s Supply Chain Center (SCC) plays a pivotal role in enhancing supply chain resilience by providing critical support to businesses navigating these complexities. The Supply Chain Summit, held on September 10, 2024, brought together leaders from government, industry, and academia to collaborate on actionable strategies and share best practices for building robust supply chain frameworks. For those interested in strengthening their role within resilient supply chains, we encourage you to explore the highlights of the event and learn more about SCC’s initiatives through the links provided above. |
