TRADEMOVES LLC
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Meet Our Team
    • TradeMoves Alumni
    • Client Testimonials
  • Customized Solutions
    • Case Studies
  • TradeMoves' Insights
    • TradeMoves' Blog
  • Careers

What to Know about Emerging Sustainability Requirements

4/30/2026

 
Picture





​

















​
​Sustainability continues to be a driving force in shaping international trade regulations. At the UN Climate Change Conference (COP 30) held in November 2025, foreign countries discussed how trade tools can advance their climate goals such as using trade measures that would encourage deforestation-free supply chains, lower carbon emissions, and eliminating unnecessary packaging waste 
[1]. Several major trading partners, including the European Union (EU) and Canada, continue to incorporate climate‑related initiatives into their trade regulations. Below are sustainability efforts underway that showcase how climate goals are being accommodated in trade policy and how U.S. exporters should prepare: 

EU & UK: Traceability and Carbon Adjustment Requirements 
The EU is leading the way in climate-friendly initiatives, tackling both traceability reporting requirements and efforts to reduce carbon emissions. This year, the EU adopted the European Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) to cut emissions and biodiversity loss by promoting “deforestation‑free” products and reducing its global deforestation footprint. By 2027, any company importing at-risk agricultural products such as cocoa, soy, and palm oil into the EU will need to prove that these exports do not originate from recently deforested land or have contributed to forest degradation [2]. U.S. exporters sourcing these ingredients for products to then be exported to the EU may be asked to disclose information to their importer to ensure compliance.  

In addition, the EU launched their Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) initiative in January 2026. CBAM implements a carbon levy on certain goods imported into the EU (i.e., fertilizers, steel, aluminum, iron, cement, electricity, and hydrogen)  [3].  In addition, EU importers must gather and report information on both the direct emissions produced during the manufacturing of processed goods and the indirect emissions resulting from the electricity used in that process. U.S. exporters of the goods may need to be prepared to track and report on their direct and indirect emissions and disclose this information to their importer. 

The United Kingdom (UK) is also following suit with similar measures. In 2019, the UK introduced guidance to support businesses in meeting the requirements of its Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting (SECR) framework. Under these rules, any UK company listed on the London Stock Exchange, an EU-regulated market, or trading shares on the New York Stock Exchange or NASDAQ must disclose their scope 1 (direct emissions), scope 2 (indirect emissions from energy), and scope 3 (value chain emissions) emissions, along with the methodologies used to calculate them [4]. These reporting requirements may extend to U.S. exporters working with UK companies.  

Canada: Reducing plastic pollution and promoting the circular economy 
Policies encouraging efforts to continually redesign, reduce, reuse, repair, refurbish, remanufacture, repurpose, or recycle products to minimize waste are becoming more common [5]. These policies intend to promote a more circular economy by reducing plastic pollution. For example, Canada started implementing their new plastics policy in 2025, which requires companies to report annually on the quantities and types of plastics they manufacture, import, or place on the Canadian market. Once fully rolled out, Canadian companies will need to disclose the amount of plastic waste generated at their industrial, commercial, and institutional facilities. As a result, U.S. exporters should be prepared to disclose information to importers and manufacturers on the types of plastics that were used when manufacturing goods [6]. 

China & Brazil: Suggested Corporate Sustainability Standards  
In 2024, China published its Basic Guidelines for Corporate Sustainability Disclosure Standards (CSDS) with a goal to align Chinese companies with global environmental, social, and governance (ESG) expectations.    This guidance marks a major step towards establishing a national sustainability disclosure system by 2030 [7]. China’s CSDS framework is designed to align with the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), strengthening consistency and enhancing cross‑border comparability in sustainability reporting by issuing general standards for sustainability and climate-related disclosures [8]. By taking this step, China is helping their importers meet sustainability standards in export markets.  

Brazil followed a similar approach to China by adopting ISSB’s inaugural sustainability standards for voluntary reporting for all companies starting in 2026 [9]. With these standards in place, Brazilian companies now have clearer disclosure requirements that help them convey to investors the sustainability‑related risks and opportunities they face. U.S. companies working with Chinese and Brazilian companies may be asked to adhere to ISSB standards.  

United States: Sustainable Packaging Innovation Lab  
The United States sustainability initiatives remain fluid, reflecting shifting priorities throughout different Administrations.   However, the United States recognizes that certain sustainability measures abroad could impose additional burdens on U.S. exporters and that businesses need assistance in transitioning to more sustainable practices. For example, several countries have adopted packaging and packaging waste regulations which ban the use of certain materials, set reuse and refill targets, and establish extended producer responsibility. Such regulations can increase costs and limit market access for U.S. exporters as they are expected to comply.  

One initiative designed to help U.S. exporters meet these requirements and better compete in overseas markets is US Department of Agriculture (USDA)’s grant as part of the Assisting Specialty Crop Exports (ASCE) Initiative to support the Sustainable Packaging Innovation Lab [10]. This initiative awarded multiple grants for research projects including innovative packaging solutions and technologies such as compostable plant-based thin film and bags, fully recyclable cellulose-based packaging, edible thin-film coating for cucumbers and bell peppers, and more [11]. The work of the Sustainable Packaging Innovation Lab demonstrates the US government’s awareness of potential sustainability-related barriers that may affect agricultural exports to foreign markets. 

Future Outlook 
These are only some of the various ways a handful of countries have pursued integration of climate-related measures into trade and business policies. However, more than 50 export markets have implemented measures designed to promote recyclability, lower carbon emissions, and reduce plastic waste. As more countries introduce climate-focused regulations, exporters must ensure they understand the relevant requirements and how to adapt to a greener, climate-friendly trade environment.  

[1] COP 30: Key issues on trade and climate agenda, IISD (4 Nov 2025) 
[2] Regulation on Deforestation-free Products, European Commission  
[3] Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, European Commission 
[4] Environmental reporting guidelines: including Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting requirements, UK Government (29 Mar 2019) 
[5] Circular Economy, Government of Canada (23 Mar 2025) 
[6] Federal Plastics Registry, Government of Canada (13 Mar 2026) 
[7] Corporate Sustainability Disclose Standards, China’s Ministry of Finance (17 Dec 2024) 
[8] China embarks on a journey of ESG disclosure: 2024 progress and focus for 2025, UN Environment Program (7 Jan 2025) 
[9] Brazil adopts ISSB global baseline, as IFRS Foundation Trustees meet in Latin America, IFRS (20 Oct 2023) 
[10] Sustainable Packaging Innovation Lab, USDA  
[11] Research funding awarded for packaging innovations to support American Fresh Produce Exporters, USDA FAS (29 July 2025) 

Supply Chain Challenges from 2024 and Beyond: Geopolitical Strife, Labor Strikes, and Climate Change Will Continue to Shape Global Trade

3/27/2025

 
Picture
Global supply chains are dynamic and complex. 2024 highlighted the persistence and evolution of challenges that tested global supply chain resilience. From escalating geopolitical tensions to labor disputes and climate-induced disruptions, these events continue to shape the global trade landscape. Below is an overview of key drivers behind disruptions and ongoing implications for industries, businesses, and consumers worldwide.

Geopolitical Tensions: Ongoing geopolitical strain between major economies such as the U.S., China, and Russia has resulted in increased trade barriers and sanctions.

  • The Russia-Ukraine war has exacerbated challenges in the global supply chain and resulted in disrupted logistics, energy crisis, food insecurity, and inflation. ·
  • Geopolitical strife between China and Taiwan, marked by persistent trade restrictions and military activities, has hindered the flow of global maritime trade across the Taiwan Strait, which handled 20% of international trade—valued at $2.45 trillion—in 2022. These conflicts have created restricted access to essential materials, heightened transportation risks, and sudden shifts in trade policy compelling companies to consider geopolitics a top priority for supply chain resilience.
  • The humanitarian crisis and regional instability of the Gaza Conflict has led to delays at key regional ports and tightened security measures affecting global shipping logistics. The conflict has especially impacted energy markets, with heightened concerns about oil supply disruptions in the Middle East. Due to the Houthi attacks, vessels are being rerouted to new trade lanes, especially costlier ones around Africa, to avoid the Red Sea/Suez Canal. These diversions have increased transit times, shipping costs, and supply chain delays.

Labor Strikes and Workforce Challenges:

  • In October, the International Longshoremen's Association (ILA) strike disrupted 36 ports from Maine to Texas, halting the flow of goods and threatening shortages of items from bananas to auto parts. The strike, estimated to cost the U.S. economy $4.5 billion weekly, created delays that reverberated through global supply chains. Although operations resumed after a tentative agreement was made, if a permanent agreement is not concluded, more strikes will occur, and shippers will face residual impacts such as terminal closures or reduced operational capacity.
  • Labor strikes also paralyzed Canadian ports, including the Port of Vancouver, which handles about 15% of Canada’s total trade. The disruption affected key exports, including coal and forestry products, halting shipments valued at over $932 million daily.
  • EU farmer strikes over influx of cheaper Ukrainian agricultural imports and stricter environmental regulations—Green Deal, disrupted European, regional and global agricultural supply chains.

Natural Disasters and Climate Change: Increased natural disasters—hurricanes, floods, and wildfires—have directly impacted supply chains.

  • Severe drought in early to mid-2024 drastically lowered Panama Canal water levels, imposing vessel restrictions, delaying shipments, and driving up rerouting costs.
  • Unpredictable weather patterns linked to El Niño—such as droughts in some regions and flooding in others—have led to global food supply chain insecurity by reducing the output of essential commodities/ingredients. For instance, Morocco’s cereal farmers have experienced reduced production due to prolonged drought, while excessive rain and flooding damaged sugar crops in Australia.

Various players throughout supply chains will be in both reactive and proactive mode to address and mitigate these challenges.

  • Port Operations: Major shipping hubs like the ports of Los Angeles and those along the East and Gulf Coasts are grappling with backlogs driven by rising shipment volumes and labor shortages. Rising shipment volumes in 2024 have been caused by a combination of factors, including a rebound in global trade activity as economies recover from pandemic-related slowdowns, increased e-commerce demand, and stockpiling by companies to mitigate risks from geopolitical tensions and supply chain uncertainties.
  • Shipping Companies: Shipping companies have faced substantial operational challenges in 2024. With limited container capacity and heightened demand, freight rates have soared, as evidenced by the sharp rise in the Shanghai Containerized Freight Index. Rerouting trade lanes to avoid congested or politically unstable regions, such as the Taiwan Strait and the Middle East, has increased transit times and operational costs. Severe drought affecting the Panama Canal compounded these challenges, as vessel size and transit restrictions forced companies to find alternative, more expensive routes, further straining profitability. This has prompted many companies to explore insurance policies as a means of mitigating risks associated with these alternative routes, helping to safeguard against potential financial losses.
  • Manufacturing Companies: Manufacturers have struggled to maintain operations amidst these disruptions. Delays at ports and rising shipping costs have hindered their ability to secure raw materials and components on time. Many have shifted from Just-in-Time (JIT) inventory strategies to Just-in-Case (JIC) models to build inventory buffers, but this shift has increased carrying costs and tied up capital that could otherwise be used for operational efficiency or investment in innovation.
  • Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs): For SMEs, the delays of port operations are more than an inconvenience; they can disrupt cash flow and inventory management, as smaller businesses often lack the buffer resources to weather extended supply chain delays. Stricter port scheduling and the ripple effects throughout supply chains have compelled SMEs to reevaluate their logistics strategies, sometimes at a significant cost. As larger companies often have more resources to absorb such delays, smaller businesses lack the same buffer, making them more vulnerable to extended disruptions. The rising costs of shipping put further financial strain on SMEs, which often operate on tighter margins. Additionally, the shift in inventory strategies has increased operational costs for SMEs, tying up capital that could otherwise be used for growth or innovation. These businesses are also struggling with increased warehousing needs and limited logistical infrastructure, further compounding the challenges they face in remaining competitive.
  • Consumers: Consumers have felt the impact of these supply chain disruptions through higher prices and reduced availability of goods. Essential goods like food have seen sharp price increases, exacerbated by the Russia-Ukraine war, which disrupted wheat, corn, and sunflower oil exports and pushed up the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Food Price Index. Labor disputes, such as those on the U.S. East Coast, have driven up wages as workers demand better pay and benefits in response to inflation and challenging working conditions; these wage increases have significantly raised costs for businesses, which are ultimately passed along to consumers. As a result, global inflation has surged, straining household budgets and reducing purchasing power.

As these issues persist, the need for proactive measures such as diversifying trade networks and fostering resilience has become more critical than ever, particularly for U.S. businesses and SMEs. The Department of Commerce’s Supply Chain Center (SCC) plays a pivotal role in enhancing supply chain resilience by providing critical support to businesses navigating these complexities. The Supply Chain Summit, held on September 10, 2024, brought together leaders from government, industry, and academia to collaborate on actionable strategies and share best practices for building robust supply chain frameworks. For those interested in strengthening their role within resilient supply chains, we encourage you to explore the highlights of the event and learn more about SCC’s initiatives through the links provided above.
    The TradeMoves blog allows our team to share and connect with our followers. We hope to continue sharing our insight and providing helpful tips. 
    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Categories

    Import-Export Advice

    Trade Policy Updates

    SME Exporters in the Know

    Women in Trade Interviews​

    ​
    TradeMoves' Updates

    ​All

Home

About Us

Customized Solutions

Meet Our Team
TradeMoves Alumni
Client Testimonials
Careers

Global Intelligence & Insights
Smart Trade Tools
Sourcing & Supply Chain Strategies
Case Studies

TradeMoves' Insights

TradeMoves' Blog

Contact Us

Please contact us at:
[email protected]

Picture
Picture
Picture
© COPYRIGHT 2016. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Meet Our Team
    • TradeMoves Alumni
    • Client Testimonials
  • Customized Solutions
    • Case Studies
  • TradeMoves' Insights
    • TradeMoves' Blog
  • Careers